Post Stastics
- This post has 877 words.
- Estimated read time is 4.18 minute(s).
Call me a control freak. But after decades in software development, I’ve learned to be cautious, especially when it comes to building systems on top of third-party APIs. While APIs can offer short-term acceleration, they often introduce long-term fragility that you can’t control.
Why Relying on 3rd Party APIs Is Risky
Using third-party APIs might seem like a shortcut, that is until you’re at the mercy of someone else’s priorities, timelines, and breaking changes. Here are the core issues:
1. Loss of Control
When you integrate with someone else’s API, you become dependent on:
- Their versioning and deprecation policies
- Their uptime and latency
- Their security practices
- Their documentation
- Their roadmap—not yours
2. Breaking Changes and API Drift
API providers can, and often do, change their endpoints, schemas, or behavior with minimal notice. If even one endpoint changes in a backward-incompatible way, your app may break.
3. Feature Gaps
Need a feature they haven’t implemented? Too bad. Your only option is often to find another provider, and deal with another API’s quirks, authentication, and behavior.
This cascade of dependencies leads to what I call “API Hell”: dozens of APIs from different vendors, all evolving on different schedules with conflicting priorities. It’s a maintenance nightmare.
4. Security Concerns
Security is the one area where I advocate not rolling your own solution. For anything beyond the most general protection mechanisms, it’s wiser to rely on well-vetted libraries and platforms maintained by security professionals.
But every API you integrate is an attack surface you don’t control. Vulnerabilities in those APIs affect you directly.
5. Maintenance Overhead
Maintaining an app that uses third-party APIs involves continual:
- Monitoring for deprecations
- Adapting to schema or behavior changes
- Handling authentication updates
- Communicating changes to internal stakeholders and customers
This adds up fast—and it’s easy to model the risk.
Modeling the Probability of App Breakage
Let’s apply some quantitative thinking to the problem.
Parameters
| Parameter | Symbol | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Number of APIs | A | Total number of third-party APIs your app depends on |
| Endpoints per API | Eᵢ | Number of endpoints used from API i |
| Total Endpoints Used | N | Sum of all endpoints used: N = ∑₁ᴬ Eᵢ |
| Monthly Change Probability | λ | Likelihood a single endpoint will break in a month |
| Time Horizon | t | Number of months over which we evaluate breakage |
Any single used endpoint changing in a way that breaks app functionality is defined as an “app break”.
Formulas
1. Monthly Endpoint Survival Probability
P_survival_per_endpoint = 1 − λ
2. App Survival Probability Over Time
P_app_survival(t) = (1 − λ)^(N × t)
3. App Break Probability Over Time
P_app_break(t) = 1 − (1 − λ)^(N × t)
Example: Discrete-Time Calculation
Assume:
A = 3APIs- API1 uses 5 endpoints, API2 uses 10, API3 uses 7 →
N = 22 λ = 0.01(1% chance per endpoint per month)t = 12months
P_app_survival(12) = (1 - 0.01)^(22 × 12) = 0.99^264 ≈ 0.0646 P_app_break(12) = 1 - 0.0646 ≈ 0.9354 → 93.5% chance of breakage in 1 year
Continuous-Time Model (Poisson Approximation)
P_survival(t) = e^(−λ × N × t)
This results in an exponential decay survival curve.
Interpreting λ (Change Rate)
| API Type | Typical λ Estimate |
|---|---|
| Aggressive, unstable APIs | 5%–10% → λ = 0.05–0.10 |
| Well-versioned APIs (AWS) | 0.5%–1% → λ = 0.005–0.01 |
| Internal APIs (monoliths) | <0.5% |
Python Plotting Code
import numpy as np
import matplotlib.pyplot as plt
def plot_api_breakage_model(api_config, lambda_rate=0.01, months=60, continuous=False):
total_endpoints = sum(api_config)
x = np.arange(0, months + 1)
if continuous:
survival = np.exp(-lambda_rate * total_endpoints * x)
model_type = "Continuous (Exponential Decay)"
else:
survival = (1 - lambda_rate) ** (total_endpoints * x)
model_type = "Discrete (Compound Probability)"
failure = 1 - survival
plt.figure(figsize=(10, 6))
plt.plot(x, survival, label="App Survival Probability", color='green')
plt.plot(x, failure, label="App Break Probability", color='red')
plt.title(f"App Breakage Risk Over Time ({model_type})\\nAPIs: {len(api_config)} | Endpoints: {total_endpoints} | λ = {lambda_rate}")
plt.xlabel("Months")
plt.ylabel("Probability")
plt.grid(True)
plt.ylim(0, 1.05)
plt.legend()
plt.tight_layout()
plt.show()
configs = {
"App A: 1 API, 10 Endpoints": [10],
"App B: 5 APIs, 5 Endpoints Each": [5, 5, 5, 5, 5],
"App C: 3 APIs, 10 Endpoints Each": [10, 10, 10]
}
for label, config in configs.items():
print(f"Generating plot for {label}")
plot_api_breakage_model(api_config=config, lambda_rate=0.01, months=60, continuous=False)
Observations from Simulation
App A: 1 API, 10 Endpoints
- ~60% chance the app still functions after 1 year
- Drops below 20% by year 2
App B: 5 APIs × 5 Endpoints = 25 Endpoints
- Breakage risk exceeds 90% by year 2
- Reliability falls sharply over time
App C: 3 APIs × 10 Endpoints = 30 Endpoints
- ~5% chance of working after 2 years
- ~99% chance of breakage by year 5
Technical Debt and Customer Fallout
Using third-party APIs might save time up front, but each integration:
- Increases future maintenance cost
- Reduces your control over outages
- Extends your attack surface
- Delays response time when problems occur
When the API breaks, your system breaks. And until the fix is identified, coded, and deployed, your customers are stuck.
Final Thoughts
Is the time saved up front really worth the downtime, lost revenue, and customer frustration?
Your answer may vary depending on project scope, team resources, and tolerance for risk. But for long-lived systems or mission-critical apps, my answer is a resounding NO.
And even if you say “yes” now, revisit that decision as your app matures. Your customers, your brand reputation, and your revenue will eventually depend on it.
TL;DR Checklist
- Model API risk before integrating
- Estimate per-endpoint change probability (
λ) - Track total endpoints (
N) - Run breakage simulations
- Replace 3rd party APIs with in-house implementations over time
- Never roll your own security—use trusted libraries
Let the numbers guide your decisions, not the hype. Integrate wisely. Maintain control. Build to last.