In today’s developer landscape, many programmers—both new and seasoned—cling to a single coding paradigm as the “one true way,” dismissing others like object-oriented, functional, or event-driven programming as bloated or misguided. But real engineering maturity comes from knowing why each paradigm exists and when to use it. The most successful developers choose their tools based on risk, scalability, and maintainability—not ideology. This article explores why the refusal to evolve beyond one style limits growth, risks project failure, and ignores decades of hard-earned lessons in software design.
Tag: software architecture
The Case Against 3rd Party APIs
Call me a control freak. But after decades in software development, I’ve learned to be cautious, especially when it comes to building systems on top of third-party APIs. While APIs can offer short-term acceleration, they often introduce long-term fragility that you can’t control. Why Relying on 3rd Party APIs Is Risky Using third-party APIs might
Navigating Complexity in Software Systems: Measurement, Control, and Simplification
Balancing design patterns with performance requirements demands a nuanced approach from software developers. While design patterns enhance code readability, modularity, and maintainability, their impact on performance must be carefully evaluated and managed…
Recent Comments